Acta Natura et Scientia
ISSN (Online): 2718-0638

Review article    |    Open Access
Acta Natura et Scientia 2026, Vol. 7(1) 1-17

The Origin and Development of FMEAs in the North American Automotive Industry: A History Review

Matthew Barsalou

pp. 1 - 17   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.61326/actanatsci.v7i1.370

Publish Date: February 25, 2026  |   Single/Total View: 0/0   |   Single/Total Download: 0/0

PDF Download Download PDF

Abstract

The concept of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis has been around for almost three-quarters of a century, yet many authors give contradictory dates for the origin of the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis and different dates for the spread of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis in the automotive industry. This paper seeks to establish a timeline for the development of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis usage in the North American automotive industry. This paper uses a historical review. Literature was identified and reviewed to document the development of the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis in the North American automotive industry using primary sources. The first standard for the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis was MIL-P-1629 in 1949. Failure Modes and Effects Analysis were used in the aerospace industry in the 1950s and the usage of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis at Ford Motor Company in 1972 and Toyota in 1975 has been confirmed. Automotive companies mandated use of the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis in the 1980s and automotive industry-specific standards were released in the 1990s and revised over the years. This paper contributes a timeline of key Failure Modes and Effects Analysis related events that is supported by documented evidence.

Keywords: Failure Modes and Effects Analysis, FMEA, Automotive industry, Risk analysis, Standards

How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Barsalou, M. (2026). The Origin and Development of FMEAs in the North American Automotive Industry: A History Review. Acta Natura et Scientia, 7(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.61326/actanatsci.v7i1.370

Harvard
Barsalou, M. (2026). The Origin and Development of FMEAs in the North American Automotive Industry: A History Review. Acta Natura et Scientia, 7(1), pp. 1-17.

Chicago 16th edition
Barsalou, Matthew (2026). "The Origin and Development of FMEAs in the North American Automotive Industry: A History Review". Acta Natura et Scientia 7 (1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.61326/actanatsci.v7i1.370

References
  1. AIAG/VDA. (2019). AIAG/VDA failure modes and effects handbook. (1st ed.). USA: AIAG. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aldridge, J.R., Taylor, J., & Dale, B. G. (1991). The application of failure mode and effects analysis at an automotive components manufacturer. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 8(3), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719110142780 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  3. Ali, J. A., Khodakarami, L., Abdulqadir, S., Abdulrahman, H., & Mazar, G. (2025). Modified FMEA quality risk management technique for cross-country petroleum pipeline using GIS. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 42(6), 1672-1705. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-08-2023-0271 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  4. Anleitner, M. A. (2011). The power of deduction: Failure modes and effects analysis for design. Milwaukee, WI Quality Press. [Google Scholar]
  5. Atkinson, P. (1989). TQM fact finding mission to Japan. The TQM Magazine, 1(2), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000003001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  6. Bowles, J. B. (2002). Failure modes and effects analysis. In W. T. Becker & R. J. Shipley (Eds.), ASM handbook: Volume II failure prevention and analysis (pp. 50-59). Materials Park, OH, ASM International. [Google Scholar]
  7. Carlson, C. S. (2015). Understanding and applying the fundamentals of FMEAs. Reliability and maintainability symposium, January, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation. (1998). Quality system requirements QS-9000, (3rd ed.). International Organization for Standardization. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chrysler LLC, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation. (2008). Potential failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA): Reference manual. (4th ed.). Automotive Industry Action Group. [Google Scholar]
  10. Collins, J. A., & Fauser, B. C. J. M. (2005). Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews. Human Reproduction Update, 11(2), 103-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmh058 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  11. Correia dos Santos, R. N., Saraiva Caldeira, L. M. M., & Serra, J. P. B. (2012). FMEA of a tailings dam. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 6(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2011.615751 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  12. DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation. (2001). Potential failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA): Reference manual. (3rd ed.). Automotive Industry Action Group. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dale, B. G., & Shaw, P. (1990). Failure mode and effects analysis in the U. K. motor industry: A state-of-the-art study. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 6(3), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.4680060304 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  14. Darmawan, D. (2025). The failure mode and effect analysis of Islamic banking product marketing in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 16(1), 290-305. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2023-0268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  15. Department of Defense. (1949). Military standard: Procedures for performing a failure mode, effects and criticality analysis MIL-P-1629. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense. [Google Scholar]
  16. Department of Defense. (1963). Military standard: Procedures for performing a failure mode, effects and criticality analysis MIL-P-1629 – cancelation notice. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense. [Google Scholar]
  17. Department of Defense. (1974). MIL-STD-1629 (ships) procedures for performing a failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense. [Google Scholar]
  18. Department of Defense. (1980). Military standard: Procedures for performing a failure mode, effects and criticality analysis MIL-STD-1629 A. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense. [Google Scholar]
  19. Department of Defense. (1998). MIL-1629A: Procedures for perfuming a failure Mmde and effects and criticality analysis. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense. [Google Scholar]
  20. Department of the Army. (2006). TM 5-698-4, failure modes, effects and criticality analyses (FMECA) for command, control, communications, computer, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR) facilities. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dhillon, B. S. (2003). Methods for performing human reliability and error analysis in health care. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 16(6), 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860310495697 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  22. Doshi, J., & Desai, D. (2016). Application of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) for continuous improvement – Multiple case studies in automobile SMEs. International Journal for Quality Research, 11(2), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.18421/IJQR11.02-07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  23. Durstine, J. W. (1973). The truck steering system from hand wheel to road wheel. SAE Transactions, 82, 93-150. [Google Scholar]
  24. Fong, J. L. F., & Antony, J. (2001). QS 9000: An overview and comparison with ISO 9000. The TQM Magazine, 13(5), 315-318. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780110401871 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  25. Fonseca, L., Lima, V., & Silva, M. (2015). Utilization of quality tools: Does sector and size matter?” International Journal for Quality Research, 9(4), 605–620. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fritzsche, R. (2011). Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA): A comparison between VDA-Approach versus QS-9000. SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-2280. https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-2280 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  27. Gandhare, S., Kumar, P., Madankar, T., Singh, D., & Bhamu, J. (2025). Development and validation of a FMEA-based medical equipment maintenance framework using Industry 4.0. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 42(8), 2250-2290. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-07-2024-0246 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  28. Ghadge, A., Fang, X., Dani, S., & Antony, J. (2017). Supply chain risk assessment approach for process quality risks. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(7), 940-954. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-01-2015-0010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  29. Ginn, D., Jones, D., Rahnejat, H., & Zairi, M. (1998). The “QFD/FMEA interface. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601069810198448 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  30. Hatty, M., & Owens, N. (1994). Potential failure modes and effects analysis: A business perspective. Quality Engineering, 7(1), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982119408918774 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  31. Henshall, E. J. (1989). Quality engineering. The TQM Magazine, 1(5), 293-298. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb059486 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  32. IATF. (2016). IATF 16949 automotive quality management standard. (1st ed.). International Automotive Task Force (IATF). [Google Scholar]
  33. Kar, A., & Rai, R. N. (2025). A modified fuzzy PFMEA model for risk-centric Six sigma assessment under the paradigm of Quality 4.0. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 16(1), 197-230. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-08-2023-0131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  34. Korenko, M., Krocko, V., & Kaplík, P. (2012). Use of FMEA method in manufacturing organization. Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering, 11(2), 48-50. [Google Scholar]
  35. Maisano, D. A., Franceschini, F., & Antonelli, D. (2020). dP-FMEA: An innovative Failure Mode and Effects Analysis for distributed manufacturing processes. Quality Engineering, 32(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2020.1729991 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  36. Manos, A., & Vincent, C. (Eds.). (2012). The lean handbook: A guide to the bronze certification body of knowledge. ASQ Quality Press. [Google Scholar]
  37. Matsumoto, K., Matsumoto, T., & Goto, Y. (1975). Reliability analysis of catalytic converter as an automotive emission control system. SAE Transactions, 84, 728–738. [Google Scholar]
  38. NASA. (1966). Procedure for failure, mode, effects, and criticality Analysis (FMCA), U.S. Department of Commerce. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pillay, A., & Wang, J. (2003). Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 79(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00179-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  40. Plinta, D., Golinska, E., & Dulina, Ľ. (2021). Practical application of the new approach too FMEA method according to AIAG and VDA reference manual. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, 23(4), 325-335. http://www.10.26552/com.C.2021.4.B325-B335 [Google Scholar]
  41. Reliability Analysis Center. (1993). Failure mode, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA). Reliability Analysis Center. [Google Scholar]
  42. SAE. (2001). ARP5580 recommended failure modes and effects (FMEA) practices for non-automotive applications. SAE International. [Google Scholar]
  43. SAE. (2002). Surface vehicle standard J1739: (R) Potential failure mode and effects analysis in design (Design FMEA), potential failure mode and effects analysis in manufacturing and assembly processes (process FMEA), and potential failure mode and effects analysis for machinery (machinery FMEA). SAE International. [Google Scholar]
  44. SAE. (2009). Surface vehicle standard J1739: (R) Potential failure mode and effects analysis in design (design FMEA), potential failure mode and effects analysis in manufacturing and assembly processes (process FMEA). SAE International. [Google Scholar]
  45. SAE. (2021). Surface vehicle standard J1739: (R) Potential failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) including Design FMEA, supplemental FMEA-MSR, and process FMEA. SAE International. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sharma, R. K., & Sharma, P. (2010). System failure behavior and maintenance decision making using, RCA, FMEA and FM. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 16(1), 64-88. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552511011030336 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  47. Sharma, R. K., Kumar, D., & Kumar, P. (2007). Modeling and analysing system failure behaviour using RCA, FMEA and NHPPP models. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 24(5), 525-546. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710710748385 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  48. Singh, R., Sharma, M., Nadeem, R., Patidar, A., & Anchliya, N. (2026). Enhancing work–life balance in the Indian health-care sector: prioritizing failures and implementing corrective interventions through failure mode effects analysis (FMEA). International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 34(2), 612–631, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-08-2024-4702 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  49. Smith, L. R. (2005). Back to the future at Ford. Quality Progress, 38(3), 50-56. [Google Scholar]
  50. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  51. Stamatis, D. H. (1996). FMEA and the QS-9000 requirement. SAE Transactions, 105, 61-73. [Google Scholar]
  52. Swift, J. A., & Flynn, T. J. (1989). Methodology for developing a quality plan within a manufacturing company. Quality Engineering, 1(4), 467-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982118908962681 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  53. Tangestani, M., Jafari, A. J., Kermani, M., & Kalantary, R. R. (2025). Development application of FMEA risk assessment model for indoor air pollutants in healthcare organizations: Focus on suspended particles and bioaerosols in hospitals. MethodsX, 14, 103342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  54. Termaat, K. B., & Freeman, K. A. (1972). Development of the crash sensor/vehicle interface. SAE Transactions, 81, 1412–1432. [Google Scholar]
  55. VDA. (2012). Quality management in the automotive industry volume 4: Quality assurance in the process landscape – General, risk analyses, methods, procedure models, product-and process FMEA. (2nd ed.). Verband der Automobilindustrie (VDA). [Google Scholar]
  56. Villacourt, M. (1992). Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA): A guide for continuous improvement for the semiconductor equipment industry. International SEMATECH Technology. [Google Scholar]
  57. Walsh, T. J. (1975). Engineering the third generation Econoline. SAE Transactions, 84, 1192-1233. [Google Scholar]
  58. Webber, J. (1990). FMEA: Quality assurance methodology. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 90(7), 21-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635579010002046 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  59. Xiao, N., Huang, H. -Z., Li, Y., He, L., & Jin, T. (2011). Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA. Engineering Failure Analysis, 18(4), 1162-1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.02.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  60. Yılmaz, A. F., & Köse, O. (2025). Advancing sustainable shipbuilding through a hybrid risk prioritization model: integrating FMEA and machine learning. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 70, 102158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102158 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  61. Zulfiqar, M., Bhat, S., Sony, M., Salentijn, W., Swarnakar, V., Antony, J., Cudney, E. A., Furterer, S., McDermott, O., Jayaraman, R., & Foster, M. (2025). Unveiling the potential of FMEA in higher education: pathway to improved risk management and quality. The TQM Journal, 37(6), 1666–1686. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-01-2024-0017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
Meta
Vol. 7 (1)
Download
Related

Volume 7 Issue 1

June 2026

All Manuscript

Acta Natura et Scientia

Copyright © 2026 Acta Natura et Scientia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC BY
All elements of this website have been created using the BOQ™ - eJournal Management System.