Research article    |    Open Access
Acta Natura et Scientia 2026, Vol. 7(1) 85-95

Growth and Chlorophyll Responses of Wheat Seedlings to Putrescine Under PEG-Induced Drought Stress

Pelin Şengül Toraman, Nuray Ergün, Berna Çalıcı

pp. 85 - 95   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.61326/actanatsci.v7i1.479

Publish Date: June 27, 2026  |   Single/Total View: 0/0   |   Single/Total Download: 0/0


Abstract

Wheat is one of the most important cereal crops worldwide due to its broad cultivation area, diverse uses, and economic importance. This study aimed to determine the shoot length, shoot fresh and dry weight, root length, root fresh and dry weight, chlorophyll a (chl a), chlorophyll b (chl b), total chlorophyll (chl a+b) amounts of wheat seedlings. The interactions of 5% polyethylene glycol (PEG-6000) and different putrescine (PUT) doses (0.5 mM and 1 mM) were examined in wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. dicoccum, Gacer, Triticum aestivum L., Konya-2002) seedlings. Under the drought stress effect caused by PEG, two wheat varieties were negatively affected and a decrease in shoot length, fresh weight, dry weight and chlorophyll amounts was observed. In Gacer wheat, an increase in fresh root weight was observed under drought stress treated with PEG, while a decrease was observed in Konya-2002. Compared to the control, it was determined that the root length of Gacer wheat was less affected by the presence of PEG than that of Konya-2002. Compared to PEG, under the effect of PUT, increases were observed in shoot length, fresh weight, root length and fresh weight, chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll content in both wheat varieties. The applied 5% PEG-6000 created a drought stress effect in wheat and it was observed that PUT reduced this stress effect. When the parameters we used in our study are examined together, these findings suggest that Gacer wheat is more resilience to drought than Konya-2002.

Keywords: Gacer, Chlorophyll, PEG-6000, Putrescine, Triticum aestivum


How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Toraman, P.S., Ergun, N., & Calici, B. (2026). Growth and Chlorophyll Responses of Wheat Seedlings to Putrescine Under PEG-Induced Drought Stress. Acta Natura et Scientia, 7(1), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.61326/actanatsci.v7i1.479

Harvard
Toraman, P., Ergun, N. and Calici, B. (2026). Growth and Chlorophyll Responses of Wheat Seedlings to Putrescine Under PEG-Induced Drought Stress. Acta Natura et Scientia, 7(1), pp. 85-95.

Chicago 16th edition
Toraman, Pelin Sengul, Nuray Ergun and Berna Calici (2026). "Growth and Chlorophyll Responses of Wheat Seedlings to Putrescine Under PEG-Induced Drought Stress". Acta Natura et Scientia 7 (1):85-95. https://doi.org/10.61326/actanatsci.v7i1.479

References
  1. Abdelmoghny, A. M., Raghavendra, K. P., & Sheeba, J. A. (2020). Morphophysiological and molecular characterization of drought tolerance traits in Gossypium hirsutum genotypes under drought stress. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 26, 2339–2353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-020-00890-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  2. Alcázar, R., Marco, F., & Cuevas, J. C. (2006). Involvement of polyamines in plant response to abiotic stress. Biotechnology Letters, 28, 1867–1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-006-9179-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  3. Alharby, H. F., Al-Zahrani, H. S., Alzahrani, Y. M., Alsamadany, H., Hakeem, K. R., & Rady, M. M. (2021). Maize grain extract enriched with polyamines alleviates drought stress in Triticum aestivum through up-regulation of the ascorbate–glutathione cycle, glyoxalase system, and polyamine gene expression. Agronomy, 11(5), 949. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050949 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  4. Alobaidy, M. G. (2013). Effect of putrescine and humic acid on cotton plant growing under salinity stress conditions. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 13(8), 1100–1110. [Google Scholar]
  5. Arnon, D. I., & Hoagland, D. R. (1940). Crop production in artificial culture solutions and in soils with special reference to factors influencing yields and absorption of inorganic nutrients. Soil Science, 50(6), 463-485. [Google Scholar]
  6. Atak, M. (2017). Buğday ve Türkiye buğday köy çeşitleri. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(2), 71–88. [Google Scholar]
  7. Balkan, A., & Gençtan, T. (2023). Investigation of the effect of drought stress on some morphological and physiological traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(1), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10846009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  8. Bukhari, M. A., Shah, A. N., Fahad, S., & Ikbal, J. (2021). Screening of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes for drought tolerance using polyethylene glycol. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14, 2808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09073-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  9. Bulut, S. (2016). Hulled wheat farming in Develi. Current Trends in Natural Sciences, 5(9), 115–119. [Google Scholar]
  10. Çömlekçioğlu, N., & Arıkan, S. (2017). Effects of physiological stress and exogenous polyamines on seedling growth and indigo amounts in Isatis tinctoria L. leaves. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 30(3), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.29136/mediterranean.360003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  11. Doğru, H., & Ergün, N. (2021). Effects of cadmium–salt interactions on growth and some genes in wheat. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 19(2), 1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1902_10191031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  12. Hebat-Allah, A. H., Shifaa, A., Marwa, E. A., & Sahar, K. M. (2023). The promotive effect of putrescine on growth, biochemical constituents and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants under water stress. Agriculture, 13(3), 587. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030587 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  13. Hellal, F. A., El-Shabrawi, H. M., & El-Hady, M. (2018). Influence of PEG-induced drought stress on molecular and biochemical constituents and seedling growth of Egyptian barley cultivars. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 16(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.10.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  14. Hussain, S. S., Ali, M., Ahmad, M., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2011). Polyamines: Natural and engineered abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in plants. Biotechnology Advances, 29, 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.01.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  15. İlhan, D., Koç, Ü. G., ... (2026). Effects of drought stress on Kars Kıvılca wheat (Triticum aestivum Schrank) populations. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 23(3), 730–755. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1456547 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  16. İlyas, M., Nisar, M., & Han, N. (2021). Drought tolerance strategies in plants: A mechanistic approach. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 40(6), 926–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-020-10174-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  17. Kadıoğlu, A. (2006). Bitki fizyolojisi. Gündüz Ofset Matbaacılık ve Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kusano, T., Berberich, T., Tateda, C., & Takahashi, Y. (2008). Polyamines: Essential factors for growth and survival. Planta, 228, 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-008-0772-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  19. Money, N. P. (1989). Osmotic pressure of aqueous polyethylene glycols. Plant Physiology, 91, 766–769. [Google Scholar]
  20. Özberk, İ., Atasay, S., & Altay, F. (2016). Türkiye'nin buğday atlası. [Google Scholar]
  21. Pandey, A., Khan, M. K., & Thomas, G. (2015). Estimation of Indian and Turkish hexaploid wheat population structure employing molecular markers. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 43(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha4319835 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  22. Pekol, S., Baloğlu, M. C., & Altunoğlu, Y. Ç. (2016). Evaluation of genotoxic and cytologic effects of environmental stress in wheat species with different ploidy levels. Turkish Journal of Biology, 40(3), 580–588. [Google Scholar]
  23. Porra, R. J., Thompson, W. A., & Kriedemann, P. E. (1989). Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 975, 384–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80347-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  24. Rahman, A., Kulik, E., Majláth, I., Khan, I., Janda, T., & Pál, M. (2024). Different reactions of wheat, maize, and rice plants to putrescine treatment. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 30(5), 807–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-024-01462-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  25. Shi, H., Ye, T., & Chan, Z. (2013). Comparative proteomic and physiological analyses reveal the protective effect of exogenous polyamines in Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) response to salt and drought stresses. Journal of Proteome Research, 12(11), 4951–4964. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr400479k [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  26. Shu, S., Guo, S. R., & Sun, J. (2012). Effects of salt stress on the structure and function of the photosynthetic apparatus in Cucumis sativus and its protection by exogenous putrescine. Physiologia Plantarum, 146, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01623.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  27. Toraman, Ş. P., Ergün, N., & Çalıcı, B. (2020). Some abiotic stress on growth and lipid peroxidation on wheat seedlings. Natural and Engineering Sciences, 5(3), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.28978/nesciences.832975 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  28. Zhong, D., Yan, H., Chen, X., Zhong, Z., Li, X., Jia, X., Chang, S., Shen, J., & Zhang, D. (2025). Exogenous putrescine modulates variety-specific cadmium tolerance in wheat seedlings: Synergistic roles of antioxidant defense and physiological homeostasis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 16, 1600603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1600603 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]